Rk Team gp g a gpg s pim ppg ppo pp% ppga tsh pk% shg shga ga gaa sv sv% en
1 Aquinas 23 90 125 3.91 833 480 25 92 27.2 12 101 88.1 3 0 58 2.50 588 .910 0
2 Cleary (Mich.) 29 98 144 3.38 846 379 18 126 14.3 39 117 66.7 4 2 141 4.82 925 .868 1
3 Concordia (MI) 27 79 114 2.93 755 411 21 131 16.0 25 109 77.1 4 1 115 4.22 856 .882 3
4 Indiana Tech 20 92 131 4.60 696 270 17 70 24.3 13 67 80.6 3 1 54 2.67 412 .884 0
5 Lawrence Technology 10 43 47 4.30 250 183 11 39 28.2 13 56 76.8 3 1 43 4.22 221 .837 1
6 Michigan-Dearborn 28 123 184 4.39 562 438 24 77 31.2 22 79 72.2 4 0 84 2.98 785 .903 2
7 Rochester 7 19 22 2.71 104 110 3 17 17.6 4 17 76.5 1 0 56 8.00 365 .867 1
Rk Team gp g a gpg s pim ppg ppo pp% ppga tsh pk% shg shga ga gaa sv sv% en
1 Aquinas 14 46 57 3.29 439 246 10 44 22.7 9 57 84.2 3 0 38 2.71 339 .899 0
2 Cleary (Mich.) 20 67 98 3.35 513 242 10 79 12.7 27 79 65.8 2 2 109 5.45 635 .853 1
3 Concordia (MI) 17 46 67 2.71 396 220 14 86 16.3 17 61 72.1 2 1 79 4.64 573 .879 3
4 Indiana Tech 16 81 120 5.06 630 214 16 65 24.6 8 61 86.9 3 1 41 2.55 315 .885 0
5 Lawrence Technology 9 39 44 4.33 221 167 11 37 29.7 12 48 75.0 3 1 38 4.20 186 .830 1
6 Michigan-Dearborn 20 85 130 4.25 447 284 19 61 31.1 12 63 81.0 2 0 57 2.83 534 .904 2
7 Rochester 4 11 13 2.75 68 46 1 11 9.1 2 11 81.8 1 0 26 6.50 180 .874 1